Skip to main content
Jorge de Lima Jorge de Lima

Case study 04 · Google Store Australia · via PHQ Studios

Introducing PayPal Pay in 4

Moving a buried payment option to the front of the consideration funnel.

Google Store PayPal Pay in 4 magazine page hero module

Hypothesis ledger

Written before design · awaiting launch data

Hypothesis

Surfacing PayPal financing earlier, with a dedicated page, will convert customers currently blocked by limited visible financing options.

Testing for

  • Earlier funnel visibility
  • Single clear offer, not a wall of options
  • Reframed as a budgeting tool, not debt

Status

Pending — launches Aug 2026

Launch confirmed for August 2026. Performance data not yet available.

Context & challenge

PayPal's financing option existed on Google Store Australia, but only as a standard gateway, surfaced for the first time at the payment step — the last screen in a six-step purchase funnel (home, product page, config, basket, checkout, payment). It carried no value-driven messaging and did nothing to influence a purchase decision before that point, underserving a payment method Australian shoppers already trust.

Role & contribution

Senior UX/UI Designer, working with Matt (Creative Director), Lauren (Copywriter), and Lexter (Production Lead).

Creative

Matt

Copy

Lauren

Production

Lexter

GetGoogle Store Australia customers who may be hesitant to purchase due to limited financing options.
ToComplete their purchase, particularly of flagship Pixel phones, by taking advantage of the new payment flexibility.
ByShowcasing the PayPal financing option via a dedicated magazine page and strategically placed routing modules and entry links.

Research & insights

Market data made the case for moving PayPal earlier in the funnel: a third of Australians say they couldn't manage their finances without BNPL, and Australians are 82% more likely to purchase from a site that offers it. AU shoppers specifically are 116% more likely to buy from a site offering PayPal Pay in 4, and roughly half of users who switch to it do so because it carries no late fees — a direct point of difference against Afterpay and Zip.

Apple and Samsung financing pages side by side
BenchmarkApple and Samsung financing pages

Competitor benchmarking against Apple and Samsung, the two dominant players in a category where Google Store holds roughly 4.5% share, showed both getting BNPL wrong in different ways. Apple's financing option isn't referenced anywhere on the desktop homepage, menu, or support page, is buried up to two clicks deep on mobile, and requires a specific credit card that can't be used online. Samsung surfaces no indication that financing exists until the last module of the phone category page or the final stage of checkout, at which point it presents six payment options at once. Neither treats financing as something worth explaining upfront.

Design strategy & approach

The opportunity was to do what neither competitor did: make PayPal visible early, keep the page simple enough that the offer reads as one clear choice rather than a wall of options, and frame it as a budgeting tool rather than a sales gimmick.

Wider research into other Australian retail categories reinforced the visibility argument: brands like Paspaley and R.M. Williams surface payment icons in footers and product pages rather than burying them at checkout, and The Iconic keeps finance messaging present through the entire consideration phase, not just at the point of sale.

Solution

The magazine page follows a defined hierarchy: a 50:50 hero module stating the offer plainly, a process module walking through how to use it, a benefits module covering installments and zero interest, a product coverage module that reframes the A$2,000 cart limit as room to expand a purchase rather than a restriction, a product carousel, an EVP module, and an FAQ module adapted from PayPal's own Pay in 4 questions.

Beyond the magazine page, routing was added at three points in the existing funnel: a storefront-level promo module and footer link, a module in the phone category page positioned to appear after users have already compared phones, and a proposed cart CTA on the product page showing a per-fortnight payment estimate — the pattern Google Store India already uses.

Final magazine page and routing modules across mobile and desktop
Final designMagazine page and routing entry points, mobile and desktop

Reflection & learnings

The clearest lesson from the competitor benchmarking was that "simple" and "hidden" aren't the same thing. Apple's page is simple but invisible; Samsung's is thorough but buried. The goal wasn't to add more information, it was to move the right amount of it earlier in the journey.

Next case study

Launching a physical store, digitally

Google Store Tokyo →